Dear Colleagues!

In spite of the technical progress reached in the twentieth century, it is necessary to recognize, that in such a fundamental area of researches as physics there has been stated an inadmissible position. Universal domination by the logically absurd and experimentally unconfirmed special and general relativity theory takes place (in the presence of direct financial state support). There is the requirement, proved by nothing, to coordinate all positions of physical theories with principles of the relativity theory. For an explanation of the phenomena, it is used the continuous heap of one ad hoc hypothesis (for a concrete special case) on other unchecked hypotheses. “Plausible pseudo-scientific” corrections of calculations after “peeping” behind the results of experiments cannot indefinitely continue without researchers’ attention. Officials from science aspire to keep an information blockade around the works criticizing the relativity theory in every way: from a prohibition to publish such articles in academic journals, before direct withdrawal from institute libraries or a prohibition to supply the books and the proceedings containing criticisms of relativity theory. Can dogmatism in science can promote moral and technical progress of mankind? Is science able to develop without free discussion of various ideas, scientific methods and results among the professional scientists? Obviously, not! And especially blasphemously to drum the absurd, unchecked ideas of relativity theory (which is not even a subject for discussion!) into “young inexperienced souls” during their education at school and high schools (unscrupulously using the necessity for trainees to receive good marks). A similar state of affairs in science can hardly satisfy people aspiring to a knowledge of truth. And a falling of the general educational level should to not disturb conceiving people.

The basic purposes of the given Address:

It is the Program-minimum. Probably, in the further it will be possible to develop and carry out joint research projects, to publish a reviewed journal, etc.

What are prospective base principles of association?

25.09.2005

 

If you basically agree with what is written in the present Address, and ready to openly join it, you can inform to the address of some data on yourself (at will) which you would like to see at the given site (data will be updated weekly). If you agree only partially with the given Reference (for example, only with the necessity of discussion by the scientific community of all arising problems) it can be reflected in last column (remarks in your statement). If for any reasons you cannot openly put “signature” (though you agree with the Appeal and are interested in information interchange), you can inform the e-mail and write that it is “confidential” (then no data on you will appear at the present page). On each letter an acknowledgement will be given.

N

Name
(at will you,
your e-mail
can be joined)

Place of work
and/or city

(at will you,
your Website
can be joined)

Your additional offers or remarks
(at will, but no more than 280 signs,
since offers of the greater volume
are not perceived by readers)

1

Sergey N.
Arteha

Ph.Dr.

Space Research Institute (Moscow,Russia)

Presence of some conventional theory should not influence opportunities of the publication of works and their discussions at conferences. Unique criteria to articles: absence of logic and physical contradictions, mathematical mistakes and the consent with experiments.

2

Joseph J.
Smulsky

Prof.

Institute of Earth of the Cryosphere (Tyumen,Russia)

The falseness of the modern scientific understanding of the world is caused by incorrect description of the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions. Electromagnetic forces depend on velocity, but gravitation force does not depend on velocity and is determined by the Newton's law. The descriptions and interpretation of all factual data, which were received in XXth century, should be reconsidered on this basis.

3

Svetlana A.
Tolchel'nikova
Ph.Dr.

Central Astronomical Observatory (Pulkovo,Russia)

 

4

Michael P.
Varin
Ph.Dr.

Saint-Petersburg,
Russia

 

5

Nikolay A.
Zhuck

Dr.Phil.,
Dr.-Eng.

Research and Technological Institute of Transcription, Translation and Replication, JSC
(Kharkiv,Ukraine)

 

6

Evgeny I.
Shtyrkov
Prof.

Zavoisky Physical-Technical Institute of Kazan SC of RAS
(Kazan,Russia)

 

7

Robert S.
Fritzius

B.S. Electrical Engineering
(Mississippi,USA)

It may be time to re-open the 1920 Shapley-Curtis "Great Debate" regarding the sizes of the Milky Way and the Universe. There was such an attempt in 1991 that dealt with Gamma Ray Bursts, but like the 1920 "debate" its results seem inconclusive.

8

Ruggero Maria
Santilli

Prof.

Institute for Basic Research
(Palm Harbor,
USA)

For inconsistencies of special relativity for antimatter, nonlocal interactions, irreversible processes, etc. see Chapter 1
Seven theorems of "catastrophic inconsistencies" of general relativity

9

Joseph A.
Rybczyk

Millennium Relativity (Chalfont,USA)

Mandate for full and unambiguous disclosure of evidence for and against all scientific theories. Updating of peer-review system to require rejection of submitted works to be based on specific evidence, or proof of inaccurate use of data, math, or logic, and not because work is in opposition to accepted theories or principles. Complete banning of the use of the researcher's qualifications, or credentials as a valid consideration in the peer-review process. Mandate that acceptance, or rejection of research findings must be based entirely on the merits or faultiness of the submitted work and not on any other consideration.

10

Walter
Babin

The General Science Journal
(Rodney,Canada)

The failure of leading physics journals to accept papers critical of theories such as relativity, amounts to a particularly insidious form of censorship. It is one of the principle reasons for 100 years of stagnation in theoretical physics.

11

Juan R.
González-Álvarez

Center for Canonical Science
(Spain)

The most wonderful aspect of dogma practitioners i know is when two of them (e.g. two Einsteinian relativists) argue that you are wrong using incompatible arguments. For example, one is sure that you are wrong because A > B whereas, at the same time, other argues that you are wrong because B > A. You claim "both replies cannot be correct at the same time!" and you receive a large silent by response... In fact, in posterior debate they even omit all reference to the other relativist. Yes, I am convinced that dogma practitioners are true specialists in ignoring evidence.

12

Andrey V.
Zaloilo

Moscow,
Russia

 

13

Glenn Borchardt
Ph.Dr.

Progressive Science Institute
(Berkeley,USA)

Supporting education in scientific philosophy free from political and religious influence. PSI views the Big Bang Theory and its supporting mathematical speculations to be indicative of the need for a revolution in modern physics and philosophy. According to Borchardt, the universe is macrocosmically as well as microcosmically infinite—just the opposite of what is currently being assumed by today’s cosmologists (see the book: The Ten Assumptions of Science).

14

Paramahamsa
Tewari

B.Sc.Engg.

Former Executive Director (Nuclear projects),
Nuclear power Corporation
(India)

Modern theories of physics are the products resultant due to misconceptions on the basic nature of space and matter and its properties at the following two stages where theories digression from reality occurred. (1) The transition from the Cartesian space of spatial reality to the Newtonian space of emptiness resulted in the exclusion of physical explanations to gravity, inertia, planetary motion, and introduced "Action at a Distance". (2) While electron was discovered and Faraday's field concept of continuous and real space was in acceptance, vortex structure of electron and atoms was being researched and investigated. Wave nature of light in fluid space was accepted. The advent of special relativity theory reversed the trend back to empty space, brought in action-at-a-distance, and under a misconception of atomic structure and misinterpretation of Planck's energy equation misconceived light as photon . Thus the quantum physics was raised on an erroneous understanding of the Planck's constant. Structural interrelationship of space and matter, nature of mass, inertia, charge and their origin , origin and creational aspects of fields, spatial forces on nuclei, atoms and cosmic bodies were lost sight off.
New concepts of a massless and dynamic space (three dimensional) is needed to reveal interrelationship, structurally, between space and matter.

15

Evgeny B.
Klushin
Dr.Tech.Sci., Prof.

Moscow State University of Geogesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK)
(Moscow,Russia)

 

16

Vadim A.
Zhmud
Dr.Tech.Sci., Prof.

Novosibirsk State Technical University
(Novosibirsk,
Russia)

RT is erroneous: there exist conclusive disproofs of RT, but a basis for RT is absent. There appear some new possibilities for progress in physics. RT brings a prejudice to Science, but the refute from RT can present adequate predictions.

17

Michael B.
Telegin

Eng.

Russia

 

18

Vladimir I.
Sekerin

Novosibirsk,
Russia

 

19

Valery N.
Bakharev

Saint-Petersburg,
Russia

 

20

Anatoly V.
Rykov

Ph.Dr.

Institute of Physics of the Earth,
(Moscow,
Russia)

 

21

Robert Neil
Boyd

Ph.Dr.

Maryland, USA

The model of gravitation developed by LaPlace in the 1850s, has gravitation being caused by a constant influx of subquantum particles ("infinitesimals"),each of which has an intrinsic velocity millions of times faster than the speed of light. Stellar and interstellar plasma processes involving subatomic particle dissociations, as the result of high dv/dt charge seperation events in stellar and interstellar plasmas are the origin of this constant in-streaming of subquantum particles which can easily attain superluminal velocities by such plasma dissociation events. Then, when these anisotropic superluminal subquantum entities encounter pre-existing matter, they are refracted and slowed down by interactions with the pre-existing matter. The reaction which occurs is experienced by matter as the pressing-down force we call gravitation. "Curved space" exists only in the imagination of the proponents of relativity theory.

22

Vasily M.
Belyaev

Dr.-Eng.

Tomsk Polytechnical University
(Tomsk,Russia)

 

23

Arkadiusz
Jadczyk

Prof., Dr.

International Institute of Mathematical Physics,
France

While it is the fact that unconventional and interesting ideas (like those of Lavrentev, Eganova, Santilli,Shipov) are rejected and/or ignored by the institutionalized science, it is also true that the same unconventional scientists often reject or ignore offers for the help from their collegues that may like to criticise some of the elements of their theories. This creates a vitious cycle and the spooks, politicians, and the military, who want to keep any real discovery in secret, and "normal scientists" in confusion, rejoyce.

24

Dragan
Turanyanin

Belgrade, Serbia

Modern physics (and science in general) could be considered as Ptolemaic by its nature. But inside that huge "alexandrian" ocean of knowledge exist few isles, which would be named as "Cosmic Foucault's Pendulums" (e.g. natural constants h, G, c, e, origin and meaning of mass, fundamental irrational numbers pi, exp, golden-phi). An insight is arising: The inner Cosmos and his dynamics is caused with Outer One. We are in the front of the Great Change (of paradigm).

25

José Miguel
Ledesma
Eng.

Buenos Aires, Argentina

The actual means of einsteinian relativity -its real core- is as follows: Every observer no accelerated is at rest in the Lorentz's aether. This idea seems to mach the relativity principle and the aether, but its contradictions appears due this idea doesn't obey one main principle of the logic: the reference systems can not be moving one respect the other and also to be, each of them, at rest respect a third one (the aether). Einstenian relativity is consequence of the subjetivistic formation of its author.

26

Aleksandr
Kushelev

Nanoworld Scientific Laboratory
(Moscow,Russia)

 

27

Victor A.
Kuligin

Voronezh State University
(Voronezh, Russia)

 

28

Galina A.
Kuligina

Voronezh State University
(Voronezh, Russia)

 

29

Maria V.
Korneva

Voronezh Scientific Research Institute of Communications
(Voronezh, Russia)

 

30

Aleksandr M.
Kumin

Krasnodar, Russia

 

31

Vladimir M.
Antonov

Dr.-Eng.

Lipetsk, Russia

 

32

Viktor
Moroz

Hoboken, New Jersey, USA

Field is declared as physical reality but it is pure mathematical object by definition as a set equations for empty space. In this case field is similar to menu: menu describes diner, but does not have energy of diner, and so field describes something, but field is not real physical object. We should separate objects physical reality and objects mathematical abstraction.

33

Nikolay A.
Popov

Phil.

Riga, Latvia

 

34

Mark
Solomonov

Moscow, Russia

 

35

Philip M.
Kanarev

Dr.Tech.Sci.,
Prof.

Krasnodar, Russia

 

36

Dmitri L.
Khokhlov

Dr.-Eng.

Sumy State University
(Sumy, Ukraine)

 

37

M.S. Jorgemanuel

Latinoamérica Ideántida

Normally the scientific level than achieves an intelectual elite is change next common in the conscience towns; however, the theories relativistic and quantum they have blocked that process for a century due to their paradoxes. The expansion of the scientific culture in the towns claims liquidation of paradoxes.

38

Nainan K.
Varghese

India

 

39

Pavel A.
Karavdin

Eng.

Chelyabinsk
(Russia)

 

40

Oleg. A.
Sheludyakov

Eng.

Barnaul
(Russia)

 

41

Jos. H.
Boersema

Groningen
(The Netherlands)

 

42

Jury G.
Kuzichev

Dr.-Eng.

Kemerovo
(Russia)

 

43

Oleg E.
Akimov
Ph.Dr.

Moscow Power Engineering Institute (Technical University)
(Moscow, Russia)

 

44

Viktor P.
Kvitko

Moscow
(Russia)

 

45

Temur Z.
Kalanov

Ph.Dr.

House of Physical Problems
(Tashkent, Uzbekistan)

All problems of theoretical physics need to be discussed. The thema is "Crisis of theoretical physics: the problem of scientific truth" (see papers ).

46

Gennadii A.
Tverdokhlebov

Phil.

(Tolyatti, Russia)

It is impossible to comprehend any experiments without the clear definition of all basic notions ("time", "space", "motion", "rest").

47

George P.
Shpenkov

Prof.

Institute of Mathematics & Physics at University of Technology & Agriculture
(Bydgoszcz, Poland)

 

48

Thomas A.
Hollings

(England)

 

49

Semen A.
Nikolaev

Saint-Petersburg
(Russia)

 

50

Eugene D.
Zhiganov

Petrozavodsk State University,
Petrozavodsk
(Russia)

 

51

Dimiter G.
Stoinov
,
Eng.

Sofia
(Bulgaria)

To win magic of a relativity, it is necessary the new theory on which basis, from a position of the classical viewpoints, the answers to the following three basic questions can be provided: What is the electric charge? What is the nature of electromagnetic waves? What is the physical reason for nuclear forces?
Open Letter

52

Vitaly P.
Dugin

ă. Kharkiv
(Ukraine)

From already known scientific phenomena deduced and then checked up by the experience, two Demokrit's hypotheses become the basical beginning of updated physics: a hypothesis about presence of absolute emptiness in the nature, and a hypothesis about presence of absolutely firm particles as agents of electric and magnetic fields in the nature.

53

Alexey P.
Chudnenko

Uralsk
(Kazakhstan)

 

54

Valery N.
Kravets

Ukraine

 

55

Andrey
Kuzin

Moscow
(Russia)

 

56

Eugeny S.
Vorsobin

Eng.

Moscow
(Russia)

L.Euler was an initiator of relativistic ideology. He has perverted the most fundamental positions of Newtonian mechanics. Just L.Euler has reduced Newton's mechanics which basis is the concept of "force" to an vulgar kinematics, considering all movements as the relative ones only, whereas the primary goal of Newton's mechanics is the finding the true movements of bodies for the reasons, their making, for their displays and for differences of seeming movements, and, on the contrary, a finding the reasons and displays by the true or seeming movements. These distortions also have resulted in the subsequent occurrence of the so-called quantum "mechanics", based not on fixed laws, but on postulates. Folowing to Euler, the uniform movement (uniform movement on a circle) began to be considered as an accelerated movement, and from here it also have begun all quantum "miracles" with so-called "not radiating" orbits, and "questions" with an energy source ostensibly needed for the accelerated movement of planets round the Sun.

57

Genrix L.
Koleda,
Eng.

Moscow
(Russia)

 

58

Felix F.
Gorbatsevich,

Dr.Tech.Sci.

GI KSC RAS
(Apatity, Russia)

 

59

Anatoly N.
Molofeev,

Prof.

Moscow
(Russia)

 

60

Jury I.
Rusinov

Tomsk
(Russia)

 

61

Anatoly F.
Sazonov

Eng.

Dubna
(Russia)

 

62

Georgy J.
Zverev

Dr.-Eng.

SRI-13 MD RF
Moscow
(Russia)

 

63

Sergey Ivanovitsh
Sergeev

Mineralnye Vody
(Russia)

 

64

Ilia I.
Kuzmin

Eng.

Krasnogorsk
Moscow region
(Russia)

 

65

Anatoly V.
Mamaev

Dr.-Eng.

Concern AAD "Almaz-Antey"
Moscow
(Russia)

 

66

Sergey V.
Mizin

Ph.Dr.

Laboratory of Solar and Cosmic-ray Physics, LPI RAS
Dolgoprudny
(Russia)

 

67

Vladimir V.
Aphonin

Eng.

Academy "ŔPK PPRO"
Moscow
(Russia)

 

68

Mark M.
Katsenberg

Rostov-on-Don
(Russia)

 

69

Usen I.
Mamyrov

Bishkek
(Kyrgyzstan)

 

70

Aleksandr A.
Antonov

Dr.-Eng., docent

Kiev
(Ukraine)

 

71

Anatoly V.
Terent'ev

Eng.

Leningrad
(Russia)

 

72

Sergey A.
Nikolaev

Eng.

Moscow
(Russia)

 

73

Alexandr P.
Sakharov

Eng.

Moscow
(Russia)

 

74

Alexandr O.
Yakovlev
Eng.

Pskov
(Russia)

Can you imagine such that no one in the world has yet measured the speed of light in one direction? Unbelievable? And it is a fact. The theory of solid ether offers to deliver such an experiment and supposes in this way big shocks.

75

Andrew
Chubykalo

Prof.

Universidad Autonoma
de Zacatecas
(Mexico)

 

       



Back to the conference title page